Griesdale makes a significant point in this paper with the
Can J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;59(1):41-52.
Glidescope® video-laryngoscopy
versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and
meta-analysis.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:
The Glidescope(®) video-laryngoscopy appears
to provide better glottic visualization than direct laryngoscopy. However, it
remains unclear if it translates into increased success with intubation.
METHODS:
We systematically searched electronic
databases, conference abstracts, and article references. We included trials in
humans comparing Glidescope(®) video-laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy
regarding the glottic view, successful first-attempt intubation, and time to
intubation. We generated pooled risk ratios or weighted mean differences across
studies. Meta-regression was used to explore heterogeneity based on operator
expertise and intubation difficulty.
RESULTS:
We included 17 trials with a total of 1,998
patients. The pooled relative risk (RR) of grade 1 laryngoscopy
(vs ≥ grade 2) for the Glidescope(®) was 2.0 [95% confidence interval
(CI) 1.5 to 2.5]. Significant heterogeneity was partially explained by
intubation difficulty using meta-regression analysis (P = 0.003). The
pooled RR for nondifficult intubations of grade 1 laryngoscopy
(vs ≥ grade 2) was 1.5 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.9), and for difficult
intubations it was 3.5 (95% CI 2.3 to 5.5). There was no difference between the
Glidescope(®) and the direct laryngoscope regarding successful first-attempt
intubation or time to intubation, although there was significant heterogeneity
in both of these outcomes. In the two studies examining nonexperts, successful
first-attempt intubation (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.4) and time to intubation
(weighted mean difference -43 sec, 95% CI -72 to -14 sec) were improved using
the Glidescope(®). These benefits were not seen with experts.
CONCLUSION:
Compared to direct laryngoscopy,
Glidescope(®) video-laryngoscopy is associated with improved glottic
visualization, particularly in patients with potential or simulated difficult
airways.
No comments:
Post a Comment